Let’s find the equivalence classes of the following finite set S:

Given S = \{ -1, 1, 2, 3, 4 \}, we can form the following relation R = \{ (-1, -1), (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (1,3), (3,1), (2,4), (4,2) \}.

Note: writing the relation R on set S in the following ways is equivalent:

-1R-1, 1R1, 2R2, 3R3, 4R4, 1R3, 3R1, 2R4, 4R2

or

-1\le -1, 1 \le1, 2 \le2, 3  \le3, 4 \le4, 1 \le 3, 3 \le 1, 2 \le 4, 4 \le 2

This relation, R has been given the symbol \le but it means “the same sign and parity” in this case. For instance, (1,3) or 1 \le 3 tells us that one and three are both odd and both have the same sign in set A (both positive).

The equivalence classes for this relation are the following sets:

\{ -1 \}, \{ 1, 3\} \text{ and } \{2, 4 \}

We obtained the above equivalence classes by asking ourselves:

  • How is the element -1 related to any other element in the set S under the definition of R?

Since R is defined as “the same sign and same parity,” then we’re really asking ourselves whether -1 has the same sign as any other element in S. Since all the other elements are positive, then -1 has the equivalence class containing only itself. Another question we would’ve asked ourselves is whether -1 is even or odd.  However, given we already know the other elements don’t have the same parity as -1, we conclude that it is the only element in this equivalence class.

In general, an element a \in A will always be in its own equivalence class.

  • How is the element 1 related to any other element in S under the relation R?

Since 1 has a positive sign and is odd, then any other positive odd element in S is related to 1. Hence 1 is related to itself and 3 only. So \{1, 3\} is our equivalence class. This is also the equivalence class for 3

  • How is 2 related to any other element in S under the R?

Since 2 has a positive sign and is even, then the only other element in S related to this element is 4.

 

We could’ve chosen to write the above equivalence classes in the following way:

[1] = [3] = \{ 1, 3\}

[2] = [4] = \{ 2, 4\}

[1] = \{ 1\}

 

Let’s find the equivalence classes of an infinite set.

Let P be the set of all polynomial functions with real coefficients. Given functions f(x), g(x) \in P, we define the relation R as f(x) R g(x) to express that the functions have the same degree.

First, note that the set P has elements of the following nature:

If h(x) \in P, then we can write as h(x) = a_0 + a_1 x_1  + a_2 x_2 ^ 2 + a_3 x_3 ^3 + .... + a_n x_n ^ n

The coefficients are real numbers a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, ..., a_n \in \mathbb{ R }

There are variables x_1, x_2, x_3, .... , x_n such that the exponent of each variable is a positive integer n \in \{ 0, 1, 2, ...., n \}

The degree of the polynomial function is the highest exponent (power) of the function.

For instance,

q(x) = 0 is a function with degree 0

h(x) = \frac{8}{79} + x_1 ^3+ \pi x_2 ^ 7 is a function in P degree 7

f(x) = x^2 , g(x) = 3 x + \sqrt(7)x^2 are both functions with the degree 2. So we can write f(x) R g(x) since that’s how our relation is defined.

To describe the equivalence class for all polynomial functions of degree 3 from our set P:

\{ a_0 +a_1 x_1 + a_2 x_2^2 +a_3 x_3^3 : a_0, a_1, a_2 \in \mathbb{R}, a_3 \in \mathbb{ R }- 0 \}

This is the set of all polynomials with real coefficients such that the degree of the function is 3. The coefficient attached to the variable with this degree x_i ^3 can have ANY real number EXCEPT zero as its coefficient.

Let’s look at another example of equivalence classes on an infinite set:

We want to find the equivalence classes of the relation \equiv \text {(mod) } 4 on set  \mathbb{ Z }, for natural number n \in \mathbb{ N}.

Let’s find the equivalence class zero:

[0] = \{ x \in \mathbb{ Z} : x \equiv 0 \text {(mod) } 4 \}

[0] = \{ x \in \mathbb{ Z} : 4 | (x - 0) \}

[0] = \{ x \in \mathbb{ Z} : 4 | x \}

[0] = \{ x \in \mathbb{ Z} :  4p = x \text { for some p} \in \mathbb{ Z } \}

By substituting different integer values for p we get the equivalence class [0] = \{ ..., -12, -8, -4, 0, 4, 8, 12, ...\}

So we have that the following equivalence classes are equal:

[0] = [4] = [-4] = [8] = [-8] = ....

Since the equivalence classes are equal, it doesn’t matter which values from the set \{ ..., -12, -8, -4, 0, 4, 8, 12, ...\} we choose to represent the equivalence class of [0].

We don’t need to be as explicit when we find the other equivalence classes.

Let’s find the equivalence for [1]:

[1] = \{ x \in \mathbb{ Z} : 4 | (x - 1) \}

[1] = \{ x \in \mathbb{ Z} :  4p = x - 1 \text { for some p} \in \mathbb{ Z } \}

[1] = \{ ..., -11, -7, -3, 1, 5, 9, 13, ...\}

So [1] = [5] = [9] = [13] = ... = \{ ..., -11, -7, -3, 1, 5, 9, 13, ...\} is our desired equivalence class.

Similarly, we can find that the last two equivalence classes \equiv \text{ (mod)} 4:

[2] = \{ ..., -10, -6, -2, 2, 6, 10, 14, ... \}

[3] = \{ ..., -9, -5, -1, 3, 7, 11, 15, ...\}

So in summary, we have exactly four equivalence classes; namely:  [0], [1], [2], [3]

Recall: we can label [2] (for instance) by any other number in the equivalence class. So we can choose to write the above equivalence classes for \equiv \text{ (mod)} 4 as the following\text{ : } [4], [-11], [2], [3]

This example has focused on the relation \equiv \text{ (mod)} 4 on the set of positive integers, \mathbb{ N }. We can generalise this result for any natural number n \in \mathbb{ N}.

\equiv \text {(mod) } n on set  \mathbb{ Z }. Hence, there will be n equivalence classes: [0], [1], [2], ..., [n-1]

Hence there will always be exactly n equivalence classes for the relation \equiv \text{ (mod)}4 \text{ on } \mathbb{ N}.

Essentially, we can imagine taking the set of Natural Numbers \mathbb{ N} and divided it into four sets:

  • I put in some of the numbers to expect in each congruence class. Note, however, that in reality these sets are infinite.

 

Modulus 4

 

 

How clear is this post?